Ahmed Glaucoma Valve as a Risk Factor for Penetrating Keratoplasty Failure

Authors

  • Karwan Bakhtyar Mohammed MBChB, HDO, KHCMS, Department of Ophthalmology, Hawler Eye Teaching Hospital, Hawler Directorate of Health, Erbil, Iraq
  • Kawa Khalil Ahmad MBChB, GBO, Consultant Ophthalmologist, Ministry of Health, Erbil, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56056/

Keywords:

Ahmad valve, Penetrating keratoplasty, Risk factor

Abstract

Background and objectives: Penetrating keratoplasty is a surgical procedure with a history spanning over a century. The objective is to identify the incidence and potential risk factor of graft failure after performing penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with Ahmed valve tube.

Methods: This retrospective study conducted on 24 patients whom penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma shunt surgery have been performed for them from February 2017 to December 2022 at North eye center/ Erbil city. The follow up was obtained for determining the risk factors associated with keratoplasty failure.

Results: Half of the patients with glaucoma drainage devices have a successful penetrating keratoplasty surgery. Age was not a risk factor for penetrating keratoplasty failure, relative risk (RR)=0.85, CI=0.38-1.88, P=0.682). Also, the following factors were not a risk for keratoplasty failure; sex (RR=1,CI=0.45-2.23, P=1), sequence of surgery of Ahmed valve prior to penetrating keratoplasty (RR=0.57,CI=0.20-1.53, P=0.206), eye laterality (RR=1.23,95%CI=0.47-3.25, P=653), aphakia (RR=4.0,CI=0.12-136.95, P=0.215) and pseudophakia (RR=5.71,CI=0.52-62.66 P=0.154), history of vitreoretinal surgery is the risk factor for penetrating keratoplasty failure (RR=3.4,95%CI=1.63-7.10,P=0.002), chronic diseases (RR=0.79,95%CI=0.34-1.86,P=0.615) and intraocular pressure>21 mmHg (RR=1.214,95%CI=0.54-2.75,P=0.653) are also risk factors for decreasing success of penetrating keratoplasty.

Conclusion: In our study, Ahmed valve is a risk factor for failure of pentrating keratoplasty surgery which is 50%. Age, gender, Ahmed valve prior to penetrating keratoplasty, lens status and operated eye were not a risk factor in pentrating keratoplasty failure in those who underwent glaucoma drainage device. Whereas, vitreoretinal surgery, chronic diseases and intraocular pressure were observed as risk factors in penetrating keratoplasty failure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bhadauria M. Glaucoma Drainage Devices (Ahmed Glaucoma Valve) in Penetrating Keratoplasty-Associated Glaucoma. Glaucoma Drainage Devices: A Practical Illustrated Guide. 2019:85-91.

2. Panda A, Prakash VJ, Dada T, Gupta AK, Khokhar S, Vanathi M. Ahmed glaucoma valve in post-penetrating-keratoplasty glaucoma: a critically evaluated prospective clinical study.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011 May-Jun; 59(3): 185–189. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.81021/

3. Hollander DA, Giaconi JA, Holland GN, Yu F, Caprioli J, Aldave AJ, et al. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with Ahmed valves.Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;150(2):169-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.02.014/

4. Gupta S, Jeria S. A review on glaucoma drainage devices and its complications. Cureus. 2022;14(9).

5. Wu AM, Stein JD, McDonnell PJ, Lee PP. Keratoplasty and Glaucoma. Albert and Jakobiec's Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology: Springer; 2022. p. 2287-330.

6. Alvarenga LS, Mannis MJ, Brandt JD, Lee WB, Schwab IR, Lim MC. The long-term results of keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):200-5.

7. Kim CS, Yim JH, Lee EK, Lee NH. Changes in corneal endothelial cell density and morphology after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation during the first year of follow up. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;36(2):142-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01683.x/

8. Mendrinos E, Dosso A, Sommerhalder J, Shaarawy T. Coupling of HRT II and AS-OCT to evaluate corneal endothelial cell loss and in vivo visualization of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Eye. 2009;23(9):1836-44.

9. Abdelghany AA, D'Oria F, Alio JL. Surgery for glaucoma in modern corneal graft procedures. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2021;66(2):276-89.

10. Coleman AL, Mondino BJ, Wilson MR, Casey R. Clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in eyes with prior or concurrent penetrating keratoplasties. Am. J. Ophthalmol 1997;123(1):54-61.

11. Tai M, Chen Y, Cheng J, Liang C, Chen J, Chen C, et al. Early Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation after penetrating keratoplasty leads to better outcomes in an Asian population with preexisting glaucoma. PloS one. 2012;7(5):e37867.

12. Williams KA, Lowe M, Bartlett C, Kelly TL, Coster DJ. Risk factors for human corneal graft failure within the Australian corneal graft registry. Transplantation. 2008;86(12):1720-4.

13. Barraquer RI, Pareja-Aricò L, Gómez-Benlloch A, Michael R. Risk factors for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Medicine. 2019;98(17):e15274.

14. Böhringer D, Spierings E, Enczmann J, Böhringer S, Sundmacher R, Goulmy E, et al. Matching of the minor histocompatibility antigen HLA-A1/HY may improve prognosis in corneal transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;82(8):1037-41.

15. Vieira-Potter VJ, Karamichos D, Lee DJ. Ocular complications of diabetes and therapeutic approaches. Biomed Res. Int. 2016;2016.

16. Chikama T, Wakuta M, Liu Y, Nishida T. Deviated mechanism of wound healing in diabetic corneas. Cornea. 2007;26:S75-S81.

17. Rapuano CJ, Schmidt CM, Cohen EJ, Rajpal RK, Raber IM, Katz LJ, et al. Results of alloplastic tube shunt procedures before, during, or after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1995;14(1):26-32.

18. Das J, Chaudhuri Z, Sharma P, Bhomaj S. The Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma: experiences in Indian eyes. Eye. 2005;19(2):183-90.

19. Fasolo A, Capuzzo C, Fornea M, Franch A, Birattari F, Carito G, et al. Risk factors for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty: 5-year follow-up from the corneal transplant epidemiological study. Cornea. 2011;30(12):1328-35.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ahmed Glaucoma Valve as a Risk Factor for Penetrating Keratoplasty Failure. (2026). AMJ (Advanced Medical Journal) , 11(1), 224-231. https://doi.org/10.56056/