Fentanyl Versus Lidocaine Intravenously to Attenuate Hemodynamic Effects of En-dotracheal Intubation

Hozan Abdulwahid  Ahmed; Amir Murad Khudadad  Boujan; Othman Ismat  Abdulmajeed

doi:10.56056/amj.2019.77

Authors

Hozan Abdulwahid Ahmed M.B.Ch. B, Erbil Training Center of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit.
Amir Murad Khudadad Boujan Assist. Prof., Consultant Anesthesiologist, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani
Othman Ismat Abdulmajeed Consultant Anesthesiologist, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2019.77

Keywords:

Endotracheal intubation, Hemodynamic response, Laryngoscopy, Lidocaine

Abstract

Background and objectives:Hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation may increase mor- bidity in the perioperative period. Those changes may become significant in patients with uncontrolled hypertension or heart diseases. In this study, we compared the efficacy of intravenous fentanyl and intravenous lidocaine in attenuating the hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation.

Methods: A total of 100 adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II from both gender aged 18 to 65 years undergoing various elective surgeries under general anesthesia, were included in this prospective, randomized, single-blind study. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups, Group F received 1mcg/kg fentanyl IV 3 minutes before intubation, group L received 1mg/kg lidocaine IV 3 minutes before intubation. Patients in both groups were anesthetized with the same technique. heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure were monitored and recorded before giving the study drug, 3 minutes after giving the study drug, 3 minutes after intubation then 6 minutes after intubation.

Results: We evaluated 100 patients including 49 males and 51 females, 62 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and 38 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II, there were significant differences between the two groups 3 and 6 minutes after intubation, F group had less rise in heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure than L group 3 minutes after induction and endotracheal intubation.

Conclusions:we concluded that fentanyl 1mcg/ kg IV had more and faster effect in blunting stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation as compared to lidocaine 1mg/kg IV.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M et al. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101:622–8.

Hassani V, Movassaghi G, Goodarzi V, Safari S. Comparison of Fentanyl and Fentanyl Plus Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia, Anesth Pain Med.2013; 2(3): 115–18. doi: 10.5812/aapm.6442

Hassal HG, el-Sharkway TY, Renck H, Mansour G, Fouda A. Hemod- ynamic and catecholamine response to laryngoscopy with vs. without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991; 35:442–7.

Chung F, Evans D. Low-dose fentanyl: Hemodynamic response dur- ing induction and intubation in geriatric patients. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985; 32:622–8.

Joo HS, Salasidis GC, Kataoka MT et al. Comparison of bolus remifen- tanil versus bolus fentanyl for induction of anesthesia and tracheal in- tubation in patients with cardiac disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(3):263–8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.003.

Ugur B, Ogurlu M, Gezer E, Nuri Aydin O, Gursoy F. Effects of esmolol, lidocaine and fentanyl on haemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation: a comparative study. Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(4):269–77. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727040-00006.

Rahimzadeh P, Faiz S, Alebouyeh M. Effects of Premedication with Metoprolol on Bleeding and Induced Hypotension in Nasal Surgery. An- esth Pain. 2012;1(3):157–61.

Sam Chung K, Raymond S, Jonathan D. A comparison of fentanyl, es- molol and their combination for blunting the haemodynamic response. Anaes Analg. 1991; 72:482–6.

del Rio Vellosillo M, Gallego G, Soliveres R, Abengochea C, Barbera A. Bolus administration of fentanyl vs continuous perfusion of remifentanil for control of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation: a randomized double-blind trial. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2009;56(5):287–91.

Imani F, Alebouyeh M, Taghipour-Anvari Z, Faiz S. Use of Remifen- tanil and Alfentanil in Endotracheal Intubation: A Comparative Study.

Anesth Pain. 2011;1(2):61–5. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.22287523.2130

Gurulingappa, Aleem A, Awati M, and Adarsh S Attenuation of Car- diovascular Responses to Direct Laryngoscopy and Intubation-A Com- parative Study Between iv Bolus Fentanyl, Lignocaine and Placebo(NS) 2012. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4070.2619

Kim WY, Lee YS, Ok SJ, et al. Lidocaine does not prevent bispectral index increases in response to endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(1):156–9. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184040.85956.98.

William M. Splinter F Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in geriatric patients: effects of fentanyl, lidocaine and thiopentone - Canadian journal of anaesthesia 1989; 36(4):370-6.

Scheinin B, Lindgren L, Randell T, Scheinin H, Scheinin M dexme- detomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal responses to tracheal intuba- tion and reduces the need for thiopentone and preoperative fentanyl

-British Journal of Anaesthesia 1992; 68: 126-31

Hoda A, Khan FA. Effect of one minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane with and without fentanyl on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 27:522–6.

Parida S, Ashraf NC, Mathew JS, Mishra SK, Badhe AS. Attenuation of the haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with gabapentin, fentanyl and a combination of both: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2015; 59:306–11.

Black TE, Kay B, Healy TE. Reducing the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. A comparison of alfentanil with fenta- nyl. Anaesthesia. 1984; 39:883–7.

Kay B, Healy TE, Bolder PM. Blocking the circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. A comparison of fentanyl and nalbuphine. Anaes- thesia. 1985; 40:960–3.

Helfman SM, Gold MI, DeLisser EA, Herrington CA. Which drug pre- vents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intuba- tion: lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol? Anesth Analg. 1991; 72(4):482-6

Malde AD, Sarode V. Attenuation of the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation: fentanyl versus lignocaine. Internet J Anesthe- siol. 2007;12(1)

Lev R, Rosen P. Prophylactic lidocaine use preintubation: a review. J Emerg Med. 1994;12(4):499–506

Bostan H, Eroglu A. Comparison of the Clinical Efficacies of Fentanyl, Esmolol and Lidocaine in Preventing the Hemodynamic Responses to Endotracheal Intubation and Extubation Journal of current surgery2012 doi:10.4021/jcs31e

Harnaya Y, Dohi S. Differences in cardiovascular response to airway stimulation at different sites and blockade of the responses by lido-caine. Anesthesiology. 2000,93(1):95-103.

Aouad MT, Sayyid SS, Zalaket MI, Baraka AS. Intravenous lidocaine as adjuvant to sevoflurane anesthesia for endotracheal intubation in children. Anesth Analg. 2003, 96(5):1325-7.

Miller CD, Warren SJ. IV lignocaine fails to attenuate the cardiovas- cular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1990; 65(2):216-9

Tam S, Chung F, Campbell M. Intravenous lidocaine: optimal time of injection before tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg.1987; 66:1036 -8

Wilson IG, Meiklejohn BH, Smith G. Intravenous lignocaine and sym- pathoadrenal responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. The effect of varying time of injection. Anaesthesia. 1991;46(3):177–80.