Outcomes of Endoscopic Assisted Versus Microscopic Assisted Type1 Tympanoplasty for Inactive Chronic Otitis Media

Authors

  • Hersh Saidgul Mustafa MBChB, KHCMS (ENT) trainee. ENT, Head and Neck surgery – Sulaimani Teaching Center Hospital
  • Yousif Ibrahim Chalabi MBCH -DLO-FICMS-CABS, Assis-tant professor and consultant otorhinolaryngology. Sulaimani University for Medical Science, School of medicine, Sulaimani, Kurdistan region, Iraq.
  • Saman Ismail Karim MBCHB-HDLO-FICMS(ENT), senior lecture, Sulaimani Teaching Center Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2019.85

Keywords:

Endoscope, Microscope, Temporalis fascia, Type 1 tympanoplasty

Abstract

Background and objectives: The objectives of this study is to assess the outcomes of the endoscope as compared to the microscope in type 1 tympanoplasty surgery for cases with inactive chronic otitis media.

Methods: Prospective comparative study was conducted from October 2016 to October 2017, forty patients underwent myringoplasty, twenty were endoscope assisted and twenty were microscope assisted. Results of surgery were compared at the end of six months post-operation.

Results: In the endoscope group 85% while in the microscope group 90% of patients had a successful outcome. Average time taken in microscopic myringoplasty was 103.75 minutes range (75 -150 minutes) while time taken in the endoscopic myringoplasty group was 82.25 minutes range (60 -120 minutes). Average hearing gain was 12.25 dB for microscope assisted group and 11 dB for endoscope assisted group.

Conclusions: The surgical result of endoscope assisted myringoplasty was similar to the microscope assisted myringoplasty although the graft taken and postoperative hearing gain in microscopic group was better than endoscopic group, but the operation dura-tion in endoscope group was shorter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gleeson M, Scott-Brown W. Scott-Brown’s otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Volume 3. 7th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2008.3396-439.

Cummings C, Flint P, Haughey B et al. Cummings otolaryngology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2015;2139-55.

Hirsch B.E. Myringoplasty and Tympanoplasty. In: myers N.E. operative otolaryngoiogy –head and neck surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia; 2008. pp1458-83.

SismamnisI A, MD. Tympanoplasty. In: Glasscock and Shambaugh. Surgery of the Ear. 5th ed. Hamilton: Elesver; 2003.463-86.

Thomassin J, Korchia D, Duchon Doris J. Endoscopic-Guided Otosurgery in the Prevention of Residual Cholesteatomas. The Laryngoscope. 1993;103(8):939.

Mer SB, Derbysshire AJ, Brushenko A, Pontarelli DA. Fiberobtic endoscopic for examination the middle ear. Arch Otolaryngol. 1967; 85(4):387-93.

Dennis SP. Endoscopic assisted middle ear surgery. In: Glasscock and Shambaugh. Surgery of the Ear. 5th ed. Hamilton: Elsevier; 2003. 325-34.

Thiagarajan B, Ulaganathan V. Endoscope assisted myringoplasty. Online Journal of Otolaryngology. 2012;2(5):18.

Presutti L, Marchioni D. Endoscopic ear surgery. Stuttgart. New York. Delhi. Rio: Thieme; 2015. 6-15.

Karhuketo TS, Ilomäki JH, Puhakka HJ. Tympanoscope-Assisted Myringoplasty. Orl. 2001;63(6):353–8.

Kozin E, Lee D. Basic principles of endoscopic ear surgery. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;28(1):2-10.

Kakehata S, Futai K, Sasaki A, Shinkawa H. Endoscopic Transtympanic Tym- panoplasty in the Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss: Early Results. Otology & Neurotology. 2006;27(1):14-9.

Jyothi AC, Shrikrishna BH, Kulkarni NH, Kumar A. Endoscopic Myringoplasty Versus Microscopic Myringoplasty in Tubotympanic CSOM: A Comparative Study of 120 Cases. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2017;69(3):357–62.

Yadav SPS, Aggarwal N, Julaha M, Goel A. Endoscope-assisted myringoplasty. Singapore Medical Journal. 2009;50(5):510–2.

Gaur RS, Tejavath P, Chandel S. Comparative study of microscopic-assisted and endoscopic-assisted myringoplasty. Indian J Otol 2016; 22:177-82.

Batni G, Goyal R. Hearing Outcome After Type I Tympanoplasty: A Retrospective Study. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2014;67(1):39–42.

Lade H, Choudhary SR, Vashishth A. Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty: A different perspective. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2014;271(7):1897–902.

Raj A, Meher R. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty—a study. Indian J Otolaryngol head neck surg. 2001:53(1):47–9.

Mc Kennan KX. Endoscopic second look mastoidoscopy to rule out residual epitympanic—mastoid cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope.1993:103:810–14.

Migirov L, Wolf M. Minimally Invasive Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery. Endoscopy - Innovative Uses and Emerging Technologies [Internet]. 2015; Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/endoscopy-innovative-us-es-and-emerging-technologies/minimally-invasive-transcanal-endoscop-ic-ear-surgery.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-29

How to Cite

Mustafa, H. S. ., Chalabi, Y. I. ., & Karim, S. I. . (2023). Outcomes of Endoscopic Assisted Versus Microscopic Assisted Type1 Tympanoplasty for Inactive Chronic Otitis Media. AMJ (Advanced Medical Journal) , 5(1), 78-81. https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2019.85

Issue

Section

Articles