Perinatal outcome of women presenting with reduced fetal movements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2023.217Keywords:
Fetal movement counting, Perinatal outcome, Reduced fetal movements, Umbilical artery DopplerAbstract
Background and objectives: Reduced fetal movement is a reason for concern in both mothers and clinicians. The objective of this study was to assess the pregnancy characteristics and perinatal outcomes in women with decreased fetal movements.
Methods: A case-control study was conducted on 489 pregnant women in Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil city from October 2021 to December 2022. They were assigned into two groups, cases consisting of 244 women with a perception of reduced fetal movements and a control group including 245 women with good fetal movements. perinatal outcome was compared between the two groups.
Results: The majority (59.5%) of the study participants were term pregnancies (? 37weeks). Among women with RFM, 32.4% were nulliparous and 59% were multiparous comparing to control group (26.9% and 63.7%, respectively). A higher proportion of women with reduced fetal movements had gestational diabetes (34%), and preeclampsia (40.2%), compared to women of Group II with the rate of 15.5% and 21.2% respectively. The rate of cesarean section was significantly higher among cases than controls (45% vs. 24.9%, respectively). The rate of abnormal Doppler among Group I women was higher than in Group II women (26.2% versus 2.9%). Significantly higher rate of neonates in Group I had low APGAR score.
Conclusions: Perception of reduced fetal movements is a reason for woman to contact their healthcare providers. The poor perinatal outcome is more evident in women with reduced fetal movements.
Downloads
References
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Reduced Fetal Movements2011.Available. from:https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_57.pdf
Linde A, Georgsson S, Pettersson K et al. Fetal movement in late pregnancy – a content analysis of women’s experiences of how their unborn baby moved less or differently. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16(1):127. DOI: PMID 27245990.
Dutton PJ, Warrander LK, Roberts SA et al. Predictors of poor perinatal outcome following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements-a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7): e39784. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039784, PMID 22808059.
McCarthy CM, Meaney S, O’Donoghue K. Perinatal outcomes of reduced fetal move ments: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16(1):169. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0964-2, PMID 27430891.
Antenatal Care: Nice guideline. national institute for clinical guidance. 2003 [cited 2021Nov10]. Available from:
http://anr-dpn.vjf.cnrs.fr/sites/default/files/NICE2003RoutineCareHealthyPregnant Women.pdf .
WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience: Sum mary Highlights and Key Messages from the World Health Organization’s 2016 Global Recommendations for Routine Antenatal Care. 2018.Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259947/WHO-RHR-18.02-eng.pdf.
Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Kenyon S. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal confidential inquiry: term, singleton, normally formed, antepartum stillbirth. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and morbidity Studies, Department of Health Science University of Leicester; 2015.Available from: https://www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/perinatal-confidential-enquiry- term- singleton-normally-formed-antepartum-stillbirth-report-2015.pdf.
Higgins LE, Johnstone ED, Heazell AE. Management of reduced fetal movements. fetal and maternal medicine review. 2013; 24(4):201-31. DOI: 10.1017/S096553951300017X.
Olesen AG, Svare JA. Decreased fetal movements: background, assessment, and clinical management. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2004; 83(9):818-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00603.x, PMID 15315592.
Barros JG, Rosado R, Ayres-de-Campos D. Fetal Movement Counting. The Global Library of Women’s Medicine. 2022. Available from: https://www.glowm.com/article/heading/vol-5--surveillance-of-fetal-wellbeing--fetal-movement-counting/id/411783
Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management NICE guideline [NG133];2019. Available from:
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng133/resources/hypertension-in-pregnancy- diagnosis-and-management-pdf-66141717671365 .
Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period NIC guideline [NG3]. 2020. Available
from: https://www.nice.org.uk/news/article/new-thresholds-for-diagnosis-of-diabetes-in- pregnancy25.
Lord M, Marino S, Kole M. Amniotic Fluid Index. StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441881/
Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies | Guidance | NICE www.nice.org.uk. 2020. Available from:
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/chapter/recommendations#monitoring-during- Labour.
Hamid NE, Alalaf SK, Al-Tawil NG. Pulsed umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound findings in management of high-risk term pregnant women during Labour. Open J Obstet Gyne col. 2017; 07(1):139-46. DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2017.71015.
Brown R, Higgins LE, Johnstone ED. Maternal perception of fetal movements in late pregnancy is affected by type and duration of fetal movement [Internet]. (Manchester escolar - The University of Manchester. Informa Healthcare; 2015. Available from: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:290507
Ali MA, Bayoumy HA, Elshabrawy AS. Effect of maternal dexamethasone administra tion on daily fetal movement count and its correlation with Doppler studies and cardioto cography. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecol ogy 2021; 10(7):2565–70. Available from: https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/arti cle/view/10424.
Zöllkau J, Swiderski L, Schmidt A, et al. The relationship between gestational diabetes metabolic control and fetal autonomic regulation, movement and birth weight. J Clin Med. 2021;10 (15):3378. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153378, PMID 34362160.
Kuile M ter (Madeleine). Investigating the cause of stillbirths preceded by reduced fetal movements: a case-control study [Internet]. umcg.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl. 2017.Available from: https: //umcg. studenttheses. ub. rug.nl/id/eprint/60.
Frøen JF, Tveit JVH, Saastad E, et al. Management of Decreased Fetal Movements. Sem inars in Perinatology. 200; 32(4):307–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sem. peri.2008.04.015.
Belay H, Tamiru A, Semahagn A. Pregnancy Outcomes of Reduced Fetal Movement and its Determinant Factors: A Case Control Study. Clinics Mother Child Health. 2020;17(354). Available from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Animut-Tamiru/publication/343614839_Pregnancy_Outcomes_of_Reduced_Fetal_Movement.
Norman JE, Heazell AEP, Rodriguez A. Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet. 2018; 392(10158):1629–38. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31543-5.
Akselsson A, Lindgren H, Georgsson S. Increased labor induction and women presenting with decreased or altered fetal movements - a population-based survey. PLOS ONE. 2019 ;14(5): e0216216. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216216
Turner JM, Flenady V, Ellwood D. Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes Among Women With Decreased Fetal Movements. JAMA Network Open. 2021; 4(4): e215071. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2778239.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahang Dizhwar Khalid, Srwa Ismael Khalid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in AMJ (The Scientific Journal of Kurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties )is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)