Evaluation of the outcome of proximal femoral nail in the treatment of unstable Intertrochanteric fracture in adult
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2024.235Keywords:
Adult, Proximal femoral nail, Unstable intertrochanteric fracturesAbstract
Background & Objectives: The incidence of intertrochanteric fractures among elderly patients is expected to be increased even further with the advancing age of the population, proximal femoral nail was introduced as a method of treatment for this fracture, which is currently the most effective surgical method. The goal is to find out the role of a proximal femoral nail in treating intertrochanteric fractures and assess the advantages and complications of this treatment method.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted on seventy patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nails at Erbil teaching hospital. They were followed up for one year, from (May 2016 to May 2017). Patients were examined for the union of fracture and complications clinically and radiologically. The functional outcome was evaluated using the Harris Hip Score.
Results: Total number of 70 patients were included in this study, 44 (62.85%) were females, and 26 (37.15%) were males. The mean operative time was (90.885 min. ±11.38SD). Infection developed in (1.42%) of the patients. The most common complication was Varus malalignment which was found in (5.7%) of the cases. Harris Hip Score-based findings were excellent-good in (85.7%) of patients.
Conclusion: Proximal femoral nail is a relatively effective treatment possibility for most unstable intertrochanteric fractures with good biological stabilization, better short-term outcomes, and minimal complications.
Downloads
References
Saarenpää I, Heikkinen T, Ristiniemi J, et al, comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(1): 255–60
Junming C, Chen Y, Peilin H, Juntao Z, Moyuan S, Youwen L. Hip arthroplasty versus proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures in older adults: a meta-analysis. J Tissue Eng 2021, 25(9): 1452-7.
Kaplan K, Miyamoto R, Levine BR, et al. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16(11):665-73.
Bolognesi M. Avulsion of the left trochanter in a 15-year-old teenager soccer player. SAS J Med 2015; 1(3):108-10
Cooper A. A Treatise on dislocations and fractures of the joints. London, England: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; 2013:4(1):10-15
Ali S, Jafar G, Sahar A. The prognostic value of tip-to-apex distance (TAD index) in intertrochanteric fractures fixed by dynamic hip screw. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2012; 4(4):32.
Netter FN. The Ciba Collection of Medical Illustrations. Ciba Pharmaceutical Co 1987:8(1):85-103.
Keogh P, Maher M, McElwain J. Grosse-Kempf intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. Ir Med J. 1991;84(2):59-61.
Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD, Hip fracture overview and evaluation and treatment of femoral neck fractures. J A A O S. 1994:2:141-49.
Cauley JA, LuiL Y, Genant HK, Salamone L, Browner W, Fink HA, .Risk factors for severity and type of hip fracture. JBone Miner RES 2009; 24(5):943-55.
Pajarinen J,LindahI J, Michelsson O, et al. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip scrow or a proximal femoral nail. A randomized study comparing postoperative rehabilitation. J B J Surgery Br2005; 87:76-81.
Maurice E. MULLER, peter Koch, Serge Nazarian, Joseph Schatzker.The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones.Edl Springer International Publishing Ag 2005;87:-81.
Anglen JO, Baumgaertner MR, SmithWR, TornettaIP, ZiraHB.Technical tips in fracture care: fractures of the hip. Instr course Lect.2008; 57:17-24.
Marchetti P, Binazzi R, Vaccari V, Girolami M, Morici F, Impallomeni C, Long-term results with cementless Fitek(or Fitmore) cups J Arthroplasty 2005;20(6);730-7.
Sahmir S, Sevmir S, Maher J, et al. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in the treatment of fractures of Proximal Femur. Med Arch. 2014; 68(3):173-7.
Kristek D, Lovri? I, KristekJ, Biljan M, Kristek G, Saki? K. The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PNFA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Coll Antropol 2010; 34(3):937-40.
Sreeraj R, Inassi J. Clinical and functional outcome of proximal femoral nailing in unstable intertrochanteric fractures. International J of Ortho. 2018; 4(1):867-72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Omar Ameen Saeed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in AMJ (The Scientific Journal of Kurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties )is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)