Evaluation of Surface Detail Reproduction of Alginate Impression Material Incorporated with Different Ratios of Sodium Hypochlorite

Bayan Yousif  Taher; Fhad Sudad Ikram

doi:10.56056/amj.2025.337

Authors

Bayan Yousif Taher B.D.S., Univerity of Duhok, college of Dentistry
Fhad Sudad Ikram B.D.S, M Sc, PhD, Assistant professor, Hawler medical university, college of Dentistry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2025.337

Keywords:

Alginate impression, Antimicrobial, Sodium hypochlorite, Surface detail reproduction

Abstract

Background and objectives: Alginate impression material considered widely used material for primary registration of oral tissue because it is accurate and simple to use. The objective of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of varying ratios of sodium hypochlorite as disinfection solution for alginate against Gram+ve streptococcus microorganisms and to measure the surface detail reproduction of alginate after disinfection.

Methods: This experimental study was carried out in Hawler Medical University, Erbil College of Dentistry from December 15, 2022, to September 1,2023.40 samples of alginate were prepared, ten samples for each tested ratio (1%,3%,5%) of sodium hypochlorite and ten samples for distilled water as control group using stainless steel dies made in accordance with American Dental Association Specifications No. 18. The surface detail was evaluated after the alginate setting. Besides, three samples of each percentage were assessed for antimicrobial activity.

Results: The samples of 1%, 3% sodium hypochlorite groups showed Owens score 1 for recording of 75 ?m and 50 ?m lines with no significant difference with control group. However, for line 20 ?m recorded mean score 2 for 1%, 3% samples which is considered significant according ADA 18 specifications. By raising the sodium hypochlorite ratios, the number of colonies decreased from 6% to 0% in terms of antibacterial activity.

Conclusions: Surface detail reproduction were not dramatically impacted when sodium hypochlorite was added to the alginate as a disinfect. While they have a clear impact on the alginate impression's control group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashley M, McCullagh A, Sweet C. Making a good impression: (a 'how to' paper on dental alginate). Dent Update. 2005;32(3):169-175.

Mortellaro C, Garagiola U, Lucchina AG, Grivetto F, Milone G, Pappalardo S, et al. The use of silicone elastomer in maxillofacial rehabilitation as a substitute for or in conjunction with resins. J Craniofac Surg.2006;17(1):152-62.

Hamrun N, Thalib B, Tahir D, Hamudeng AM, Akbar FH. Physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid dental impression materials obtained from brown algae species pandina sp. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018; 1073:0520118.

Zayed SM, Alshimy AM, Fahmy AE. Effect of surface treated silicon dioxide nanoparticles on some mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer. Int J Biomater. 2014; 2014:750398.

Hatamleh MM, Watts DC. Effects of accelerated artificial daylight aging on bending strength and bonding of glass fibers in fiberembedded maxillofacial silicone prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(5):357-63.

Kaur G, Jain P, Uppal M, Sikka R. Alginate impression materials: from then till now. Heal Talk J Clin Dent.2012;5(2):38-9.

Visser A, Raghoebar GM, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Fate of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses: life span and aftercare. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):89-98.

Murata H, Kawamura M, Hamada T, Chimori H, Nikawa H. Physical properties and compatibility with dental stones of current alginate impression materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31:1115–22.

Rubel BS. Impression materials: A comparative review of impression materials mostly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51:629–42.

Junevicius J, Pavilonis A, Surna A. Transmission of Microorganisms from Dentists to Dental Laboratory Technicians through Contaminated Dental Impressions. Stomatologija. 2004; 6:20-23.

Kugel G, Perry RD, Ferrari M, Lalicata P. Disinfection and communication practices: a survey of U.S. dental laboratories. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131:786-92.

Rebecca LT, Wright PS, Maryan C. Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts. Dent Mater 2007;18(2):103-10.

American National Standard/ American Dental Association Specification No. 19. Council on Scientific Affairs 2004. Dental Elastomeric Impression Materials Chrome extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/ADA/preview_ANSI+ADA+Specification+No.+19-2003.pdf/

Touyz LZ, Rosen M. Disinfection of alginate impression material using disinfectants as mixing and soak solutions. J Dent. 1991;19(4):255-257.

American Dental Association Specification No. 18. Council on Scientific Affairs 1992. ADA Specification No. 18: 1992. Alginate Impression Materials. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/ADA/preview_ANSI+ADA+Specification+No.+18-1992.pdf/

Revised American Dental Association Specification no. 19 for Non-aqueous, Elastomeric Dental Impression Materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977;94(4):733-741.

Owen CP. An investigation into the compatibility of some irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and dental gypsum products: Part II. A refined discriminatory procedure. J Oral Rehabil.1986;13(2):147-62.

Nassar U, Chow AK. Surface Detail Reproduction and Effect of Disinfectant and Long-Term Storage on the Dimensional Stability of a Novel Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Material. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(6):494-498.

Fricker-Hidalgo H, Lebeau B, Kervroedan P, Faure O, Ambroise-Thomas P, Grillot R. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C. Ann Biol Clin. 1995;53(4):221-5.

Gutierrez J, Martin E, Lozano C, Coronilla J, Nogales C. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1994;52(6):443-6.

Chidambaranathan AS, Balasubramanium M. Comprehensive Review and Comparison of the Disinfection Techniques Currently Available in the Literature. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e849-e856.

Samra RK, Bhide SV. Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of impression materials from developing countries and developed countries after disinfection with different immersion disinfectant systems and ultraviolet chamber. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(2):125-141.

Amalan A, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya N. Evaluation of properties of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials mixed with disinfectant liquids. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013;10(1):65-73.

Badrian H, Ghasemi E, Khalighinejad N, Hosseini N. The effect of three different disinfection materials on alginate impression by spray method. ISRN Dent. 2012; 2012:695151.

Moura CD, Moura WL, França FM, Martins GA, Nogueira LB, Zanetti RV. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite steam: Assessment of surface roughness and dimensions of gypsum models. Revista Odonto Ciência. 2010; 25(3):276-81.

Boksman L, Tousignant G. Alginate substitutes: rationale for their use. Dent Today. 2009;28(4):104-05.

Walker MP, Burckhard J, Mitts DA, Williams KB. Dimensional change over time of extended-storage alginate impression materials. Angle Orthod.2010;80(6):1110-15.

Imbery TA, Nehring J, Janus C, Moon PC. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended pour and conventional alginate impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(1):32-9.

H.S. Shambh, Anil Kumar Gurjjari. The effect on surface detail reproduction of Alginate Impressions Disinfected with sodium hypochlorite and Ultraviolet light. Jornal of indian prosthodonic society .2010.03(10):41-47.

Altaf J, Malik MHA, Mir HA, Mushtaq MA, Munir MU, Shah AA. The effect of sodium hypochlorite disinfectant on the linear dimensional stability of alginate impression material. Professional Med J 2022; 29(9):1310-1314.