Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Trial of Vaginal Delivery Versus Cesarean Section in Preterm Pregnancies

Zhyar Fouad  Anwer; Maryam Bakir  Mahmood

doi:10.56056/amj.2025.371

Authors

Zhyar Fouad Anwer MBChB, KHCMS/Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainee, Sulaimani Maternity Teaching Hospital, Sulaimani Directorate of Health, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq.
Maryam Bakir Mahmood MBChB, FICOG, DGO, Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Department of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2025.371

Keywords:

Cesarean trial, Neonatal outcome, Preterm pregnancy, Trial of labor (VBAC)

Abstract

Background and objectives: A trial of labor after cesarean is a vital strategy to reduce neonatal morbidity associated with cesarean section. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effects of planned cesarean and vaginal delivery on neonatal outcomes in preterm pregnancies.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 100 pregnant women with previous cesarean section at Sulaimani Maternity Teaching Hospital from May 2022 to May 2023. Patients’ data with neonatal outcomes were collected and the correlation between the mode of delivery and various causes (preterm vaginal birth to preterm planned cesarean) was determined.

Results: The maternal age, using steroids during pregnancy, and antenatal care not affected the delivery mode (p=0.195, p=0.517, and 0.16, respectively). In contrast, gestational age (p=0.02), past medical history (p=0.05), and causes of delivery (p=0.037) significantly was affecting the delivery mode. Additionally, fetal morbidity (p=0.806) and appearance/pulse/grimace/activity/and respiration score (p=0.509) were not related to delivery modality. The leading cause of fetus admission to the neonate intensive care unit in both groups was respiratory distress syndrome (n=43), followed by sepsis (n=14), while the leading causes of neonatal death in both groups was sepsis (n=10) and respiratory distress syndrome (n=6) (p?0.05).

Conclusions: The mode of delivery is affected by gestational age, past medical history, and delivery causes. Respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis were the leading causes of neonatal admission to the intensive care unit, and sepsis with respiratory distress syndrome was the leading cause of neonatal death.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Rietveld AL, Heestermans LA, Kazemier BM, Teunissen PW, de Groot CJ. Women with a preterm cesarean have high rates of successful trial of labor in a subsequent term pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(07):709-714.

2. World Health Organization statement on caesarean section rates. WHO; 2015.

https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf/

3. Sondgeroth KE, Wan L, Rampersad RM, Stout MJ, Macones GA, Cahill AG, et al. Risk of maternal morbidity with increasing number of cesareans. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(04):346-351.

4. Knight H, Gurol?Urganci I, Van Der Meulen J, Mahmood T, Richmond D, Dougall A, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(2):183-192.

5. Bellows P, Shah U, Hawley L, Drexler K, Gandhi M, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, et al. Evaluation of outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(17):2092-2096.

6. Rouzi AA, Alamoudi R, Ghazali S, Almansouri N, Kafy A, Alrumaihi M, et al. A retrospective study of the association of repeated attempts at trial of labor after cesarean birth on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Int J Women Health. 2021:1081-1086.

7. Bulletins?Obstetrics CoP. ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2): e110-e127.

8. Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK, Ellervik C. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2019;19(1):1-12.

9. Ram M, Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Nassie D, Lavie A, Yogev Y, et al. Trial of labor following one previous cesarean delivery: the effect of gestational age. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 297:907-913.

10. Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(9):1414-1420.

11. Dombrowski M, Illuzzi JL, Reddy UM, Lipkind HS, Lee HC, Lin H, et al. Trial of labor after two prior cesarean deliveries: patient and hospital characteristics and birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(1):109.

12. Tefera M, Assefa N, Roba KT, Gedefa L. Adverse Neonatal Outcome are More Common among Babies Born by Cesarean Section than Naturally Born Babies at Public Hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: A Comparative Prospective Follow-Up Study at Eastern Ethiopia. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021; 8:2333794X211018350.

13. Vecchioli E, Cordier A-G, Chantry A, Benachi A, Monier I. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study. Plos One. 2020;15(8): e0237132.

14. Suresh S, Dude A. Neonatal outcomes in trial of vaginal birth versus repeat caesarean delivery in preterm pregnancies: A prospective cohort study. BJOG: An International J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;129(8):1319-1324.

15. Litwin CE, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Zakhari A, Abenhaim HA. Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after Caesarean delivery: a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(16):2148-2154.

16. Rahman S, Ullah M, Ali A, Afridi N, Bashir H, Amjad Z, et al. Fetal outcomes in preterm cesarean sections. Cureus. 2022;14(8).

17. Rotem R, Hirsch A, Barg M, Mor P, Michaelson-Cohen R, Rottenstreich M. Trial of labor following cesarean in preterm deliveries: success rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a multicenter retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;308(3):863-870.

18. Attanasio LB, Paterno MT. Correlates of trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States. J Women Health. 2019;28(9):1302-1312.