A Comparative Study Between Pap Smear and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid in Screening of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer at a Tertiary Maternity Hospital (Erbil/Iraq)

Authors

  • Shkofa Khalid Mohammed M.B.Ch.B, KHCMS, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil-Iraq.
  • Trifa Yousif Mutalib M.B.Ch.B, F.I.C.O.G. ,Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil-Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56056/410

Keywords:

Cervical cancer, Screening, Sensitivity and Specificity

Abstract

Background and objectives: Global concern persists over cervical cancer, demanding efficient early detection methods. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of Pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and early cervical cancer.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, comparative study conducted from the 1st of January 2023 to the 31st of December 2023 at the Maternity Teaching Hospital/Erbil, Iraq, to screen 200 patients, aged between 18-60 years by doing Pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and early cervical cancer. The indicators of diagnostic value including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were analyzed.

Results: Pap smear exhibited a sensitivity of 94.12% while visual inspection with acetic acid showed a sensitivity of 82.35%. The specificity of Pap smear was 64.52%, whereas the visual inspection with acetic acid test had a specificity of 25.8%. The positive predictive value of Pap smear was 59.26% compared with 37.84% for visual inspection with acetic acid. In terms of negative predicted value, Pap smear achieved 95.24%, whereas visual inspection with acetic acid reached 72.73%. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy of Pap smear was 75%, whereas visual inspection with acetic acid had an accuracy of 45.83%.

Conclusion: Pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid tests possess a high sensitivity and, to a lesser extent, specificity, making them effective screening tools for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and early cervical cancer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. 1.Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(2): e191-e203.

2. 2.Vahedpoor Z, Behrashi M, Khamehchian T, Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M, Moravveji A, Mohmadi-Kartalayi M. Comparison of the diagnostic value of the visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and Pap smear in cervical cancer screening. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;58(3):345-348.

3. 3.Arbyn M, Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S, Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F, et al. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(12):2675-86.

4. 4.Muhammad AW, Bahoo HI. Pap smear in Early Detection of Cervical Precancerous Lesions in Erbil. AMJ. 2024;9(1):89-96.

5. 5.Khalid FK, Ali MS. Analysis of Cervix Intraepithelial Neoplasia Prevalence in the Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Cureus. 2023;15(9): e45725.

6. 6.Tao L, Han L, Li X, Gao Q, Pan L, Wu L, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for cervical neoplasia: a cervical cancer screening program in Beijing. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(19):1185.

7. 7.Campaner AB, Fernandes GL. Cervical cancer screening of adolescents and young women: further evidence shows a lack of clinical value. J PediatrAdolesc Gynecol.2021;34(1):6-11.

8. 8.Zhang S, Xu H, Zhang L, Qiao Y. Cervical cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening.Chin J Cancer Res. 2020;32(6):720-8.

9. 9.Basoya S, Anjankar A. Cervical cancer: early detection and prevention in reproductive age group. Cureus. 2022;14(11): e31312.

10. 10.Macios A, Nowakowski A. False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening—Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health. Diagnostics. 2022;12(6):1508.

11. 11.Mahmud G, Tasnim N, Iqbal S. Comparison of Visual Inspection with acetic acid and Pap smear in cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(8):1013-6.

12. 12.Sami J, MakajioLS, Jeannot E, Kenfack B, Viñals R, Vassilakos P, et al. Smartphone-based visual inspection with acetic acid: an innovative tool to improve cervical cancer screening in low-resource setting. Healthcare. 2022;10(2):391.

13. 13.Sauvaget C, Fayette J-M, Muwonge R, Wesley R, Sankaranarayanan R. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(1):14-24.

14. 14.Bhattacharyya AK, Nath JD, Deka H. Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer. J Midlife Health. 2015;6(2):53-8.

15. 15.AieshaKhatun N, Gudi SN. A Comparative Study of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Papsmear in Screening Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Sch Int J ObstetGynec. 2021;4(6):241-9.

16. 16.Shukla D, Patel PR, Singh P, Gangwani A, Pandey M. Comprehensive Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Modalities: A Comparative Analysis between Liquid-Based Cytology (Pap Smear) and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) with Histopathological Correlation. J Cardiovasc. Dis. Res. 2024;15(3):1-10.

17. 17.Khalil RY, Qader KA. Comparative Study of Cervical Pap Smear and Visual Inspection of The Cervix to Detect Premalignant Disease of The Cervix. KJAR. 2020;5(1):210-7.

18. 18.Basanna SK, Charita U, Anuradha S. Comparison of Pap Smear with Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid in Screening of Carcinoma Cervix.J. Pharm. Negat. Results. 2022;13(9):4923-33.

19. 19.Tehranian A, Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi A, MotieiLangeroudi M, Aghajani R. Comparison of Visual Inspection Methods Using Either Acetic Acid Solution or Lugol’s Iodine Solution with Colposcopy in Screening of Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study. JOGCR. 2022;8(1):53-6.

20. 20.Honarvar Z, Amiri F. Comparing some screening values of Pap test and visual inspection with acetic acid in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions (2016-2017).J Occup HealthEpidemiol. 2018;7(3):132-8.

21. 21.Chen Q, Zhao J, Xue X, Xie X. Effect of marital status on the survival outcomes of cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER database. BMC Women's Health. 2024;24(1):75.

22. 22.Yasmin S, Munir T, Javaid A, Yasin KF, Hassan J. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of papanicoloau (PAP) Smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) in screening of cervical carcinoma, taking biopsy as gold standard. Professional Med J. 2020;27(4):863-9.

23. 23.David J, Joshi V, Aaron DJ, Baghel P. a Comparative Analysis of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid, Cervical Cytology, and Histopathology in the Screening and Early Detection of Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of the Cervix. Cureus. 2022;14(9): e29762.

24. 24.Niyodusenga A, Musoni E, Niyonsaba S. Comparative study of Pap smear test and VIA test in cervical carcinoma screening among women aged over 20 years. Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2020;3(1):21-9.

25. 25.Jain R, Jatav J, Jain A. Diagnostic utility of pap smear and visual inspection of acetic acid for the detection of various cervical lesions. Asian J. Med. Sci. 2022;13(9):213-18.

26. 26.Pourasad-Shahrak S, Salehi-Pourmehr H, Mostafa-Garebaghi P, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Malakouti J, Haghsay M. Comparing the results of Pap smear and Direct Visual Inspection (DVI) with 5% acetic acid in cervical cancer screening. Niger Med J. 2015;56(1):35-8.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Comparative Study Between Pap Smear and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid in Screening of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer at a Tertiary Maternity Hospital (Erbil/Iraq). (2025). AMJ (Advanced Medical Journal) , 10(4), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.56056/410