Minimal Incision Lateral Temporal Brow lift: An Evaluation Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56056/Keywords:
Complications, Lateral brow lift, TechniquesAbstract
Background and Objective: The lateral brow is crucial for facial aesthetics, often descending with age due to skin laxity, gravity, and the absence of brow retractors. The aim of this study is to elevate the lateral brow using a minimal, inconspicuous incision within the temporal hairline.
Methods: This retrospective observational study, conducted in Duhok, Iraq, from October 1, 2022, to the end of March 2023, examines the outcomes of a minimal incision temporal brow lift technique over a 6-month period, involving 25 patients. Inclusion criteria required patients to be over 18 years of age, with no prior brow lift procedures or facial trauma, and a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Patients with unrealistic expectations, such as those who anticipated results beyond the reasonable capabilities of a minimal incision brow lift, were excluded to ensure that patient satisfaction aligned with achievable outcomes. Additionally, specific hair characteristics—such as sparse hair, a wide, non-hairy temporal area, or thin or shaved sideburns in male patients—were taken into account. Preoperative assessments were performed with patients awake and standing to evaluate brow position and any asymmetries. Neurotoxin injections to the orbicularis oculi muscle were administered 14 days postoperatively to prevent brow descent.
Results: Gender differences in satisfaction were observed, with a higher satisfaction rate among females (14, 56%) compared to males (1, 4%). Satisfaction was also higher under local anesthesia (9.36%) versus general anesthesia (6.24%). Complications reported included internal stitch exposure 1 (4%), unilateral neuropraxia 1 (4%), skin necrosis 1 (4%), scar alopecia 1 (4%), asymmetry 1 (4%), and chronic postoperative pain 4 (16%).
Conclusions: This minimal incision brow lift is a practical, safe method for brow elevation, though further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits.
Downloads
References
1. Kashkouli MB, Abdolalizadeh P, Abolfathzadeh N, Sianati H, Sharepour M, Hadi Y. Periorbital facial rejuvenation; applied anatomy and pre-operative assessment. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 1;29(3):154-68.
2. Turin SY, Vaca EE, Cheesborough JE, Sinno S, Mustoe TA. Simplified lateral brow lift under local anesthesia for correction of lateral hooding. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jun;7(6) doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002098/
3. Fakih-Gomez N, Zarate JM, Rodriguez-Chaker S, Haneef M, Fakih D, Fakih-Gomez I. Contemporary Direct Brow Lift with Suspension Technique. The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. 2024 Jun;41(2):69-78.
4. Farhadi H, Rezaei E, Shojaeianbabaei G. Modification of temporal brow lift procedure with transillumination. Eur J Plast Surg. 2023 Jul 29:1-6.
5. Pascali M, Bocchini I, Avantaggiato A, Cervelli V. Our experience with brow ptosis correction: A comparison of 4 techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Mar;3(3): e337.
6. Savetsky IL, Matarasso A. Lateral temporal subcutaneous brow lift: clinical experience and systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 24;8(4). doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002764/
7. Xu L, Zhong X, Wang T. Quantitative and Aesthetic Analysis of Changes in Eyebrow Position After Subbrow Blepharoplasty. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2024 Aug 21:1-8.
8. Goodson A, Sarwar M, Rehman U, Brennan PA. Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. CRC Press; 2024 Apr 11.
9. Brucato D, Ülgür II, Alberti A, Weinzierl A, Harder Y. Complications Associated with Facial Autologous Fat Grafting for Aesthetic Purposes: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery–Global Open. 2024 Jan 1;12(1): e5538.
10. Tabatabai N, Spinelli HM. Limited incision nonendoscopic brow lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Apr 15;119(5):1563-1570.
11. Koch RJ. Radiofrequency nonablative tissue tightening. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2004 Aug;12(3):339-46, vi.
12. Cho MJ, Carboy JA, Rohrich RJ. Complications in brow lifts: a systemic review of surgical and nonsurgical brow rejuvenations. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Oct 15;6(10).
13. Kuhlefelt C, Repo JP, Jahkola T, Kauhanen S, Homsy P. Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Long-term follow-up on health-related quality of life and satisfaction with breasts. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2024 Jan 1; 88:478-86.
14. Herruer JM, Prins JB, van Heerbeek N, Verhage-Damen GW, Ingels KJ. Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1596-1605.
15. Rohrich RJ, Cho MJ. Evidence-based medicine in aesthetic surgery: the significance of level to aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1195e-1202e.
16. Park NS. Choosing Upper Blepharoplasty, Infra-brow Lift, and Forehead Lift in Asians: An Algorithmic Approach from Personal Experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Feb;48(4):644-651.
17. Su X, Lin Y, Wu Y, Feng K, Xiang N, Hu Z, et al. Effectiveness and safety of knotless barbed sutures in cosmetic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Dec; 87:416-429.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammed Ali Fareed Mohammed Ali, Kurdo Akram Qaradaghy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright on any article published in AMJ (The Scientific Journal of Kurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties )is retained by the author(s) in agreement with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)










